4 ms·
Neither of those things are representative of those with tattoos, and are a pretty small outlier. Reductio ad absurdum, in my opinion. That being said, I would
by junon 6y ago
Neither of those things are representative of those with tattoos, and are a pretty small outlier. Reductio ad absurdum, in my opinion.
That being said, I wouldn't personally care. Not my life to live and I don't have time to police the actions of others. Plus, I'm sure they'll face their own set of issues related to such imagery that go far beyond anything I could do about it.
- brailsafe 6y agoYou seemed to care enough and have the time to try and police my opinion about my own judgement, also providing your own by suggesting there might be consequences to my hypothetical but observed example. I personally don't think anything is necessarily representative of people with tattoos, never mentioned any such generalization, and find your comment defensive as though I was attacking you personally. If you have a tattoo of the sort, why wouldn't you just add a contrary point of view?