3 ms·
No, it targets any digital platform at the discretion of a single elected Member of Parliament. If /r/australia got too influential or troublesome to this poli
by denismi 6y ago
No, it targets any digital platform at the discretion of a single elected Member of Parliament.
If /r/australia got too influential or troublesome to this politician, in the lead up to an election perhaps, then there is no need to get anything through parliament - this individual can essentially add reddit.com to a list and then send Condé Nast the bill.
- jedberg 6y ago> and then send Condé Nast the bill. Just so you know, Conde Nast hasn't owned reddit for over a decade.
- denismi 6y agoIsn't that like saying "it's not owned by Google, it's owned by Alphabet"?
- jedberg 6y agoNo, it would be more like saying Nest owns Google because they have the same parent company. If anything, reddit is the larger of the two. And the parent company that own Conde Nast (Advance publications) does not own all of reddit, unlike how Alphabet owns all of Google.