3 ms·
This sounds like an ungenerous interpretation of the parent. They are saying - all humans do good things and bad things. You are attacking the argument - all hu
by randomsearch 6y ago
This sounds like an ungenerous interpretation of the parent. They are saying - all humans do good things and bad things. You are attacking the argument - all humans are the same. Those two assertions are totally different.
- ALittleLight 6y agoI am taking the point that "all humans do good and bad things" as a response to the commentary on Polanski, as a kind of excuse for Polanski or as saying that we shouldn't be too harsh or "cancel" Polanski because, after all, all humans do good and bad things. The point I'm trying to make in return is that while it is true that all humans do good and bad things, some humans, like Polanski, do genuinely terrible things, and the fact that all humans do bad things should not be an excuse for ignoring or looking over genuinely terrible things.