4 ms·

No way this is happening for real...he's suing /u/DeepFuckingValue because he took a loss trading? Then what's next? Suing your state's DoT every time you get a

• woeirua 6y ago
  You can actually do this in some cases....
  • macintux 6y ago
    I once got a flat tire where INDOT was clearly at fault (or their contractors). I contacted them to warn them about the very dangerous situation[1], and they offered to pay my expenses, although I had road hazard coverage on the tires so it wasn’t necessary. [1]: If anyone’s curious, I was compelled to drive over a mile on a tire rapidly losing air because of a pothole that should have been patched before they started highway construction that day. Both shoulders were blocked by barriers, the busy highway had been narrowed to two lanes, and the very deep/sharp pothole was just past an exit, so I could do nothing but speed (carefully) through a construction zone to get to the next exit before my tire went completely flat.
• grumple 6y ago
  Is your post meant to be ironic?
• perennate 6y ago
  I mean, frivolous lawsuits are nothing new: https://www.thebalancesmb.com/most-ridiculous-lawsuits-of-all-time-4110919 https://www.thebalancesmb.com/most-ridiculous-lawsuits-of-al... They usually get tossed out pretty quickly. "In 2016, an Illinois man sued Starbucks for misrepresenting the amount of liquid contained in its cold drinks. ... The judge agreed with Starbucks' argument that a reasonable consumer who orders an iced drink expects the drink to contain both liquid and ice."
• sgarman 6y ago
  As Matt Levine always says "Everything is securities fraud."