I agree that expecting permanent employment based on passion would be an overly-entitled attitude. But the author's complaint, that employees treat the product

I agree that expecting permanent employment based on passion would be an overly-entitled attitude. But the author's complaint, that employees treat the product as "a tool to advance the employees career, not a passion, mission or economic game changer", seems ridiculous in a context where an employee can be fired as soon as they're no longer useful. Why should he complain that employees look out for themselves if no one else is going to?