3 ms·
On one hand, it’s pure propaganda from the side that didn’t already have the first satellite or human in space to their name. On the other, landing on an extra
by rm_-rf_slash 6y ago
On one hand, it’s pure propaganda from the side that didn’t already have the first satellite or human in space to their name.
On the other, landing on an extraterrestrial body is a significantly more difficult challenge, particularly the precision computing to steer the lunar lander.
Computers at the time were hand-welded and unsuitable for the rigors of space (turbulence, radiation). The brand new invention of the integrated circuit sought to solve these problems, but they were wildly expensive, so the US dumped boatloads of money into making them cheaper and easier to manufacture. Neil Armstrong stood on the moon, and the foundations for the personal computing era were in place.
So in a way, Silicon Valley owes an eternal debt of gratitude to Cold War propaganda insistent that the finish line of the space race was to be the lunar surface.
- Koshkin 6y agoOTOH see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luna_9 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luna_9