It's a weak-man's deontological ethics. A serious philosophical debate would be about the ethics of taking 10k random people and forcibly or unknowingly inject

It's a weak-man's deontological ethics. A serious philosophical debate would be about the ethics of taking 10k random people and forcibly or unknowingly injecting them with an experimental vaccine that, if successful, might save millions. This is about the ethics of allowing volunteers who know the risks to do it. I don't think any sensible person, deontological or otherwise, seriously advocates an ethical system that would disallow that.