2 ms·
For the record, I am not one of the people downvoting you. To address your question, this is not a U.S. problem. This is a modern dietary problem. Some coun
by LinuxBender 6y ago
For the record, I am not one of the people downvoting you. To address your question, this is not a U.S. problem. This is a modern dietary problem. Some countries are just late to the game and the stats have to play catch-up. People are eating a lot of sugar, processes foods, alcohol, excessive carbohydrates, basically sugar sugar and more sugar. This spikes insulin and eventually the cells in the body become resistant to the hormone. It take a while for this to reach the stages of metabolic syndrome, pre-diabetes or diabetes. Because of the time it takes, people do not associate the bad behavior with the bad outcome. Most are either unaware or in denial. [1] The report is from 2017, but this problem is only getting worse and it is not limited to the U.S. It is also not limited to people that are overweight. When people have any of the previously mentioned conditions, the liver becomes fatty. Eventually the liver starts putting fat into other parts of the body. Sometimes it is super obvious large belly but sometimes the fat is stored around the internal organs. This is actually very dangerous, not because of weight, but because of the increased risk in cancer. Working out is a great thing to do, but it will never account for more than about 15% of weight loss. The rest is related to environment and dietary intake, or lack thereof. So many are in denial or unaware that even talking about this in a public forum quickly becomes taboo and results in emotional responses.
[1] - https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2017/p0718-diabetes-report.html https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2017/p0718-diabetes-repor...
- rabuse 6y agoI'm definitely aware it's a global issue, but I can't grasp the idea that the majority of people in the world, have no care to how they look or feel, especially with humans being so obsessed with aesthetics and genetic potential.
- LinuxBender 6y agoThis basically goes back to what I was saying. It's cause and effect. People can buy things to directly affect their external appearance nearly real time. People don't associate their bad dietary and lack-of-exercise behavior that affects their external appearance. The cosmetic industry is proof of this. There are tens of thousands of cremes that contain vitamins, enzymes and other nutrients. This is not by itself a bad thing, but people are applying these components incorrectly. Applied internally these components have a vast array of long lasting affects throughout the entire body. Applying these things externally has limited short-lasting effects, albeit more real time. That is why those industries are making a killing. Visible affect, limited term efficacy. People also do not associate the bad things they eat with all of the external visible dysfunctions they are creating and compensating for on their skin.