4 ms·
Okay, ‘according to the documentation’ it probably is. In reality it isn’t. Like they say, In theory, there’s no difference between theory and practice. In pr
by tinus_hn 6y ago
Okay, ‘according to the documentation’ it probably is. In reality it isn’t.
Like they say,
In theory, there’s no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.
Here’s a list of things that can go wrong (here in the context of domain controllers):
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/troubleshoot/windows-server/identity/jet-database-errors-recovery-steps https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/troubleshoot/windows-server...
Some of them are just the unavoidable hardware failures, for others they suggest ‘Deploy the OS on server-class hardware’. Or the always helpful ‘restore from backup’. Not quite reasonable for a database containing a search index on a consumer device.
- Const-me 6y ago> Here’s a list of things that can go wrong (here in the context of domain controllers) That article was written because DC is a business-critical infrastructure. Here’s a comparable one about Oracle: https://docs.oracle.com/cd/A87860_01/doc/server.817/a76965/c28recov.htm https://docs.oracle.com/cd/A87860_01/doc/server.817/a76965/c... NTFS: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/windows/it-pro/windows-server-2012-r2-and-2012/hh831536(v%3dws.11) https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/windows/i... > Not quite reasonable for a database containing a search index on a consumer device. Before I switched to MS Outlook, I was using Windows live mail (now discontinued) as an e-mail client for a decade or so, it used ESENT for everything. When I run process explorer and search for “esent.dll”, it finds a dozen of system services using ESENT databases, many of them critical like CryptSvc. I try to buy good hardware, but that’s not server-grade components. I don’t use ECC RAM nor a UPS, and I suffer from brief power outages couple times a year. If ESENT would be corrupting databases when the power is turned off suddenly, I would have noticed.
- tinus_hn 6y agoYour experiment with a sample size of 1 proves, with an uncertainty of 100%, that the database never corrupts. Experiments with a larger sample size show a different result.