5 ms·
If "survival" only means continued metabolism and respiration, yes. But I submit that "survival" means more than just that. We're human beings, so for us, surv
by maxharris 15y ago
If "survival" only means continued metabolism and respiration, yes.
But I submit that "survival" means more than just that. We're human beings, so for us, survival requires independent thought, art, science, honesty, self-esteem, productive work, and a whole lot more.
- eru 15y agoI'd call that "independent thought, art, science, honesty, self-esteem, productive work", and keep the definition of survival close to something like "You're heart's still beating.".
- maxharris 15y agoBut the problem with your definition is that if we go by it, human survival in the long-term is not included. Your mind's independent thought is ultimately the thing that ensures that your heart keeps beating. Without it, there will come a point where you can't keep making the things you need to stay alive physically.
- Travis 15y agoI understand where you're coming from, but not everyone has the same ethical sense that you do. I think you would be hard pressed to say that people without those things (art, science, productive work, honesty, etc.) are not surviving. Maybe they aren't thriving... but that's different. I think Maslow's heirarchy of needs is pretty relevant here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslows_hierarchy_of_needs http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslows_hierarchy_of_needs