3 ms·
I think it's safe to say that there is no wildlife in Europe, so this is more or less correct.
by demosito666 6y ago
I think it's safe to say that there is no wildlife in Europe, so this is more or less correct.
- forgotmypw17 6y agoAre you sure about that? This page suggests otherwise: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fauna_of_Europe https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fauna_of_Europe
- qayxc 6y ago> I think it's safe to say that there is no wildlife in Europe, so this is more or less correct. You don't go out too much, do you? In my municipality we have wolves - at a population density of 214 ppl/km² no less. Since there's no recorded killings of livestock by wolves and they have to eat something, it's save to assume we're OK on boars and deer, too. Not to mention the rabbits, hares, badgers, various songbirds, birds of prey, insects and other critters I encounter on a daily basis when walking the dog. Through the local woods. Which are very much filled with wildlife. edit: I got the population density wrong - it's actually much lower if the entire area is considered, not just the town :) the correct figure including all land would be ~45 ppl/km².