3 ms·
> Because graphical programming are just textual programming languages which are just overly complex (xml) i don't think that's fair. i mean, on a computer, yo
by uryga 6y ago
> Because graphical programming are just textual programming languages which are just overly complex (xml)
i don't think that's fair. i mean, on a computer, you have to serialize everything into sequences of bytes. you could also encode images into XML:
<pixel r="255" g="80" b="110" />
<pixel r="11" g="0" b="203" />
...
but i wouldn't say that makes them "textual".