Although the article didn't go deep into the ins and outs of the ramifications, I think the article did a reasonable job of explaining the legal situation relev

Although the article didn't go deep into the ins and outs of the ramifications, I think the article did a reasonable job of explaining the legal situation relevant to the story to casual readers, albeit at the cost of the backstory. From the article: > If the beneficiary is entitled to the money and did not know it was accidentally wired, they can keep it. Revlon lenders said they believed Citibank was wiring prepayments for a loan.