3 ms·
Rather than sifting through massively multivariate data from epidemiological studies, better to see what vitamin D actually does at the molecular level. Huge li
by vixen99 6y ago
Rather than sifting through massively multivariate data from epidemiological studies, better to see what vitamin D actually does at the molecular level. Huge literature on this. For instance, it doesn't 'seem' to modulate the immune system. It does. Start from there and then see how these reactions are attenuated.
Can best advice can be extrapolated from this: The people who took Vitamin D supplements consistently for a year before being hospitalized did better because people who can do anything consistently for a year will do better - this selects for high-conscientiousness people who care a lot about their health and have good relationships with their doctors - though one might say 'Anything?'.
- mlyle 6y ago> better to see what vitamin D actually does at the molecular level. Naaaah. Biologically plausible mechanisms of something helping don't predict what actually works as measured in an RCT so well. In the end, you have to try things. Sure, having plausible mechanisms helps: you probably shouldn't be trying the most implausible, crazy things so much. But even most things that seem like they should work, don't.