> I hope someone enjoyed this cold medicine fuled aside. I very much did, thank you. I hadn't heard the term "repeal by implication" and now you've got my curi

> I hope someone enjoyed this cold medicine fuled aside. I very much did, thank you. I hadn't heard the term "repeal by implication" and now you've got my curiosity peaked and have a new wikipedia hole to go down. FWIW, my argument is a loser. Never in a hundred years do I think it would win in court, and I think a new clear amendment will be necessary, but that's where I'd make my stand given the current laws. (I'm resigned to think this might not be a hypothetical b/c I can only espouse SciHub so many times before some angry bear comes after me—though luckily there are a lot braver souls out there peacefully doing a lot more than mme leaving forum comments). :)