your insistence that opinions imply “free will” is an interesting position, but your attempts to invoke it as a frame for your replies without bothering to subs

your insistence that opinions imply “free will” is an interesting position, but your attempts to invoke it as a frame for your replies without bothering to substantiate it on the merits does pattern-match to common troll behavior. Consequently there’s nothing wrong with someone joining the discussion to address this. > Doubly so if others like Erlich_Bachman, who was involved in the subtread earlier, have already answered to the parent what was meant... I’ve read and responded to Erlich_Bachman, who was kind enough to offer some remarks in support of his position. We have yet to understand why you and others believe that opinions require “free will.”