3 ms·
Yes and no :) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northeast_blackout_of_2003#Sequence_of_events https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northeast_blackout_of_2003#Seq... I re
by tharkun__ 6y ago
Yes and no :)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northeast_blackout_of_2003#Sequence_of_events https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northeast_blackout_of_2003#Seq...
I really like this minute by minute play.
> Estimated total affected people 55,000,000
Now this is not supposed to be a "NA vs. Europe" thing. So here we go:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_European_blackout#Timeline https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_European_blackout#Timelin...
Funny how this was actually caused by a planned shutdown of a specific line to let a ship pass. Something that had been done before :)
> In total, over 10 million people in northern Germany, France, Italy, Belgium, and Spain lost power or were affected by the blackout
It's especially funny how while this was less total people affected, it spread much more so to speak. I would tend to believe that this is actually due to the fact that Europe's power grid is way more interconnected, meaning that they could power more people more quickly again by just routing electricity differently than they would usually do.
- Retric 6y agoOr just Yes. That US blackout was completely isolated to the Northeast Power Coordinating Council (NPCC), all other regional grids where unaffected. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_power_transmission_grid https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_power_transmiss.... “The regions are not usually directly connected or synchronized to each other, but there are some HVDC interconnections.” It’s just a question of cost. Regional grids could have more resiliency internally, but large blackouts are rare enough it’s not considered worth it.