8 ms·
I believe this is the "Argument to Moderation" logical fallacy [0]. > Argument to moderation is the fallacy that the truth is a compromise between two opposing
by mleonhard 6y ago
I believe this is the "Argument to Moderation" logical fallacy [0].
> Argument to moderation is the fallacy that the truth is a compromise between two opposing positions.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_to_moderation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_to_moderation
- annoyingnoob 6y agoI'm saying that I can't eat french fries everyday, but once in say 15 days isn't so bad. That isn't true of Benzene. Prop 65 would warn you to abstain from many things, many things that need more science.