4 ms·
I think that you're just reiterating things that OP understands. We know that if the chemicals are there, we have to have the sign. And we know that the chemic
by appletrotter 6y ago
I think that you're just reiterating things that OP understands.
We know that if the chemicals are there, we have to have the sign. And we know that the chemicals are everywhere.
So what benefit does the sign bring?
None.
- nickff 6y agoI agree that the signs are usually useless, but the parent says a/the problem is that there is no penalty for erroneous signs. The problem is that the law doesn’t take context into account, and those signs are actually required.
- bcrosby95 6y ago> The problem is that the law doesn’t take context into account, and those signs are actually required. Not actually true. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=HSC§ionNum=25249.10 https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySectio.... Companies are choosing to CYA because if they're sued the burden of proof is on them.