4 ms·

"19. Sedlik requires that all licensed reproductions of The Iconic Miles Davis Portrait include Sedlik’s copyright management information." I hope he would mak

"19. Sedlik requires that all licensed reproductions of The Iconic Miles Davis Portrait include Sedlik’s copyright management information." I hope he would make an exception in the case of a tattoo. I can't imagine going through life with a copyright notice or a © symbol tattooed on my body.

brailsafe 6y ago
I can't imagine going through life with a tattoo the size of my entire upper arm of someone's photo. The copyright symbol could at least arguably be ironic.
- junon 6y ago
  Your personal life experiences and subjective viewpoints about how to utilize one's own body do not trump others'. If you do not want a tattoo, that is fine, but your distaste toward them should not influence others' abilities to do the same.
  - brailsafe 6y ago
    Thank you for insight. I hadn't considered that others might have a different opinion. All sarcasm aside, to take it to a logical and pedantic extreme, even while I wouldn't want someone to change their body based on my opinion, you probably wouldn't want someone to tattoo themselves with black face or a swastika, so I don't entirely agree.
    - junon 6y ago
      Neither of those things are representative of those with tattoos, and are a pretty small outlier. Reductio ad absurdum, in my opinion. That being said, I wouldn't personally care. Not my life to live and I don't have time to police the actions of others. Plus, I'm sure they'll face their own set of issues related to such imagery that go far beyond anything I could do about it.
      - brailsafe 6y ago
        You seemed to care enough and have the time to try and police my opinion about my own judgement, also providing your own by suggesting there might be consequences to my hypothetical but observed example. I personally don't think anything is necessarily representative of people with tattoos, never mentioned any such generalization, and find your comment defensive as though I was attacking you personally. If you have a tattoo of the sort, why wouldn't you just add a contrary point of view?

brailsafe 6y ago

I can't imagine going through life with a tattoo the size of my entire upper arm of someone's photo. The copyright symbol could at least arguably be ironic.

junon 6y ago
Your personal life experiences and subjective viewpoints about how to utilize one's own body do not trump others'. If you do not want a tattoo, that is fine, but your distaste toward them should not influence others' abilities to do the same.
- brailsafe 6y ago
  Thank you for insight. I hadn't considered that others might have a different opinion. All sarcasm aside, to take it to a logical and pedantic extreme, even while I wouldn't want someone to change their body based on my opinion, you probably wouldn't want someone to tattoo themselves with black face or a swastika, so I don't entirely agree.
  - junon 6y ago
    Neither of those things are representative of those with tattoos, and are a pretty small outlier. Reductio ad absurdum, in my opinion. That being said, I wouldn't personally care. Not my life to live and I don't have time to police the actions of others. Plus, I'm sure they'll face their own set of issues related to such imagery that go far beyond anything I could do about it.
    - brailsafe 6y ago
      You seemed to care enough and have the time to try and police my opinion about my own judgement, also providing your own by suggesting there might be consequences to my hypothetical but observed example. I personally don't think anything is necessarily representative of people with tattoos, never mentioned any such generalization, and find your comment defensive as though I was attacking you personally. If you have a tattoo of the sort, why wouldn't you just add a contrary point of view?