3 ms·
I meant from the perspective of the user/consumer/customer. One says "I am very useful, please pay me $100k!" The other says "I think you are very useful, ple
by Judgmentality 6y ago
I meant from the perspective of the user/consumer/customer.
One says "I am very useful, please pay me $100k!"
The other says "I think you are very useful, please consider this $100k signing bonus!"
Yes, they're both trying to sell you something. But it's very different when someone is trying to take your money and someone is trying to offer you money.
- ak217 6y agoBut it's not their bonus to give. The recruiters' incentives are structured the same way as the realtors: they're facilitating a transaction while taking a commission. Sell-side realtor:employer-side recruiter::buy-side realtor:employee-side recruiter. The main difference is that you're not legally obligated to go through a recruiter to get a job, so recruiters have to work a bit harder to justify their value.
- Judgmentality 6y agoOkay, I am obviously failing to communicate my point. I don't care whether or not recruiters literally have money to pay you. The point is, recruiters are in a position of trying to offer you money in exchange for services. Realtors are in the position of trying to offer you services in exchange for money. That was the juxtaposition I was pointing out.
- ak217 6y agoI agree, it does look nicer from the recruit's side :)