Not GP, but the traditional kanban way is for the doer to move it to the next column. The reviewer can then move it back if they’re not satisfied. Kanban has

Not GP, but the traditional kanban way is for the doer to move it to the next column. The reviewer can then move it back if they’re not satisfied. Kanban has branched into so many different directions from the original, since people feel inspired to create their own boards. The double column approach may have its own advantages. What bothers me is when tools layer on more functionality that interfere with the basic act of moving items between columns. The last iteration of Microsoft’s kanban tool wanted you to set status by right clicking and coloring. By clicking done the task would vanish from the board. In their conception of kanban the columns were only for categorization and not for a process.