> misunderstand value for how something is achieved. I find this line of reasoning offensive as it assumes that people who genuinely disagree with me don’t und

> misunderstand value for how something is achieved. I find this line of reasoning offensive as it assumes that people who genuinely disagree with me don’t understand. I think it’s more likely that people understand and genuinely disagree. It’s dismissive to just not respond to someone’s values and rationing and I think leads to less discussion and thus more disagreement. It’s very likely that people place different values on things and I think to have conversation we have to get to common ground and then build from there. If different people miss the meat of an argument then I think it’s not as interesting or useful.