> but was protecting sources As others have pointed out, the problem was not (just) with lack of sources, but with the fact that the few technical details they

> but was protecting sources As others have pointed out, the problem was not (just) with lack of sources, but with the fact that the few technical details they gave didn't make sense. As a result, the article read like it was written by someone who was completely ignorant and was just not credible on the face of it.