thanks for building this. maybe you can point me in the right direction with the naming. Names like /club/ (house) or /jam/ sounds like they might appeal to an

thanks for building this. maybe you can point me in the right direction with the naming. Names like /club/ (house) or /jam/ sounds like they might appeal to an audiophile. apart from using a name that suggests it lends itself to collaborative online music sessions is there anything in this technology that improves on the sound quality/delivery over what the existing platforms do? tl;dr: Music production evolves over time and digital content distribution is very different in the mixing business. Older formats are not built with streaming in mind and so you lose a lot of quality during upload to streaming services: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHxMsawJsTc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHxMsawJsTc Instead of just another SaaS that claims they've invented the group-call (which we could already do over circuit-switched networks minus the data monetization & user tracking) is there any benefit for those of us who really take the "listening" part seriously?