3 ms·
At this point, this seems to fall into one of two categories: - A childish fixation on spy novels with no journalistic work put behind, or evidence for that ma
by aneutron 6y ago
At this point, this seems to fall into one of two categories:
- A childish fixation on spy novels with no journalistic work put behind, or evidence for that matter.
- A concerted effort to actively and timely harm Supermicro.
How does one write an article, TWICE, unsubstantiated, both times, and tanks the compaby's stock TWICE, and still get away with it.
Hell, half of the facts or occurrences in the article are not even related to Supermicro.
What the hell is even this article
- turbinerneiter 6y agoNot sure if it is an urban legend, but some people say "journalists" at Bloomberg get a bonus depending on how much their articles move the stock price of their target^^
- jstrong 6y agowe must have read different articles. I read one where multiple credible people went on the record to say the FBI had warned them that supermicro servers were compromised.
- aneutron 6y agoHence the "half" part. We have yet to see 1ny condemning evidence. No code, no written report, nothing.