3 ms·
Two things: First, I didn't realize at first it was from 2007; I noticed that only after I went back to get the link to send to a friend. I still think it's in
by jamesbritt 15y ago
Two things: First, I didn't realize at first it was from 2007; I noticed that only after I went back to get the link to send to a friend. I still think it's interesting and relevant.
Second: Reading Byrne's description of what is music, and how it was tied to social events, I thought to myself that, well, people could play music themselves, and if not so inclined could whistle, hum, or sing without needing other people. Then I imagined a world where all music had to be generated by people, or, more to the point, where playing music was not ubiquitous and easy.
What a weird existence that would make.
I realize there are people today who live this way, but I have a very hard time really understanding what that means, how that changes life.
- michaeldhopkins 15y agoActually, playing or singing music would become ubiquitous and easy. You'd know hundreds of very singable songs. You'd hear live music almost everywhere you went in a city. Group musical activities such as concerts and dances would become very popular again. The art of writing music would probably approach its former levels over several generations (once the low point generations had passed on.)