4 ms·
Not OP - I don't think this statement needs that phrase. Venice was Venice 500 years ago.
by vijayr02 6y ago
Not OP - I don't think this statement needs that phrase. Venice was Venice 500 years ago.
- dmos62 6y agoHaha, missed that.
- laurencerowe 6y agoWhile Venice was Venice, Italy wasn’t yet Italy.
- BerislavLopac 6y agoIt was. "Italy" (Italia to the natives) is both the name of the modern country (which didn't exist back then) and the peninsula (which did).
- Tade0 6y agoAt the time Venice was the capital of the Republic of Venice, so its inhabitants would think of themselves as first and foremost Venetians. Also Venice isn't located strictly on the peninsula.
- dragandj 6y agoBut, the sentence says “what is now Venice”. It’s Venice now, ant it was Venice then. It’s been Venice for the past 1000 years. I guess that it wasn’t “Venice, Italy”, but “Venice, The Venetian Republic” then, but I ascribe this oddity to there being “Paris, Texas” for the USA audience while the rest of the world knows that when you say Paris, you mean the capital of France and not “Paris, the nail salon down the road”. Likewise, 500 years ago, it wasn’t “Venice, the Venetian Republic” since anyone who would understand what Venice or The Venetian Republic is, would not need any qualifying of Venezia, or whatever local name they used for that city. Anyway, the OP referred to the weirdest place in the sentence for that qualification because nothing else was qualified (was Alaska even Alaska back then? ;)