> Having said that, I don't think you are wrong on python being "the least worst language for everything" -- very few other languages have an eco system of remo

> Having said that, I don't think you are wrong on python being "the least worst language for everything" -- very few other languages have an eco system of remotely comparable expansiveness and quality (the top minds in several disciplines mostly use python for their work) which alone kills of huge swathes of would-be-competitors. Yes, I agree. The ecosystem is part of what makes the language "the least worst language for everything."