3 ms·
I didn't mean to imply anything other than what I wrote. I actually mean to ask the exact question: How does one distinguish between software that can be used
by djoldman 6y ago
I didn't mean to imply anything other than what I wrote.
I actually mean to ask the exact question: How does one distinguish between software that can be used for surveillance and software that cannot?
To be more specific, if an ethicist objects to the publication of software that can be used for surveillance, they are assuming that the software can be used for surveillance. How did they arrive at that conclusion?
- anigbrowl 6y agoIf you're so curious, I suggest you do what I did and read more of their public statements and writings to satisfy your curiosity.
- djoldman 6y agoThanks for your suggestion. Of the 16 linked papers/book-chapters a few were not freely accessible. Of the ones that were accessible, 3 contain the string "surveil" in the body and 1 contains it in the bibliography. None of the references were helpful unfortunately. Do you have any other links that may answer the question?
- anigbrowl 6y agoI'm not here to spoon feed you.