5 ms·

> It is way too early to draw any conclusions about Comma's safety. I definitely would not consider any car with adaptive cruise control without driver monito

> It is way too early to draw any conclusions about Comma's safety. I definitely would not consider any car with adaptive cruise control without driver monitoring, especially one that touts self driving capabilities.

slg 6y ago
Be my guest if you want to argue the merits of one system over another based on some technical specs or design decisions. My point is that the track records are not long enough to draw any statistical conclusions and the Tesla and Uber have killed people but Comma hasn't argument is at best wildly misleading given the large differences in miles driven.
- yannoninator 6y ago
  > Anyone know if this has killed someone yet? > ...Tesla and Uber have killed people but Comma hasn't... So no then. This is the correct answer, thank you.
  - slg 6y ago
    I just started an aerospace company making planes in my garage. My company has killed less people than either Boeing or Airbus. Does that mean I make safer planes than either of those two companies? A sentence can be technically correct while also being actively misleading.
    - yannoninator 6y ago
      > A sentence can be technically correct while also being actively misleading. So we can say no deaths by comma, until proven otherwise. Definitely not misleading.
  - ncallaway 6y ago
    This seems to deliberately ignore the pretty reasonable argument being made. If you can't address the argument the other person makes, it seems like the more reasonable thing to do is acknowledge that fact, rather than just ignore their point entirely.
    - yannoninator 6y ago
      Everything else that person said was irrelevant to this thread. I'm looking for straight answers, not going around points, but getting straight to them. > ...it seems like the more reasonable thing to do is acknowledge that fact, rather than just ignore their point entirely. The fact that Tesla and Uber has more deaths than Comma? That I can agree with.

slg 6y ago

Be my guest if you want to argue the merits of one system over another based on some technical specs or design decisions. My point is that the track records are not long enough to draw any statistical conclusions and the Tesla and Uber have killed people but Comma hasn't argument is at best wildly misleading given the large differences in miles driven.

yannoninator 6y ago
> Anyone know if this has killed someone yet? > ...Tesla and Uber have killed people but Comma hasn't... So no then. This is the correct answer, thank you.
- slg 6y ago
  I just started an aerospace company making planes in my garage. My company has killed less people than either Boeing or Airbus. Does that mean I make safer planes than either of those two companies? A sentence can be technically correct while also being actively misleading.
  - yannoninator 6y ago
    > A sentence can be technically correct while also being actively misleading. So we can say no deaths by comma, until proven otherwise. Definitely not misleading.
- ncallaway 6y ago
  This seems to deliberately ignore the pretty reasonable argument being made. If you can't address the argument the other person makes, it seems like the more reasonable thing to do is acknowledge that fact, rather than just ignore their point entirely.
  - yannoninator 6y ago
    Everything else that person said was irrelevant to this thread. I'm looking for straight answers, not going around points, but getting straight to them. > ...it seems like the more reasonable thing to do is acknowledge that fact, rather than just ignore their point entirely. The fact that Tesla and Uber has more deaths than Comma? That I can agree with.