Neither one really clarifies what your post above was trying to say, and actually raise more questions than they do provide answers. You linked the entire DA's

Neither one really clarifies what your post above was trying to say, and actually raise more questions than they do provide answers. You linked the entire DA's bio (the good & bad), and a news story about a specific meeting that was dysfunctional. Going from that to SF being a "sad story of bad governance" is a bit of an unexplored jump. I invite a post actually explaining what you're trying to say.