You are trying to draw usefulness from the article but the point of the article is not to inform but to generate anxiety and with it ad revenue. I remember rea

You are trying to draw usefulness from the article but the point of the article is not to inform but to generate anxiety and with it ad revenue. I remember reading a Cochrane Review meta-analysis confirming a link between processed meat consumption and recto-colon cancer, from memory this probably more than 10 years ago. None of this is new information. I am all for reducing meat consumption but these 'informational' articles from the guardian and often even the bbc and nyt should be banned as low-value adding submissions. Unless there are reporting about a recent major world event these sites have (in my opinion) no place in HN.