3 ms·
S/he apparently hasn't posted because of possible investigations. If posting daily is perceived as influencing investors, then an investigator looking for someo
by nevi-me 6y ago
S/he apparently hasn't posted because of possible investigations.
If posting daily is perceived as influencing investors, then an investigator looking for someone to blame, would go after such a person.
- jmalicki 6y agoHe is already testifying before Congress. He's not exactly hidden.
- newacct583 6y agoWatch for a request for an immunity deal. Objectively this guy should be in a ton of trouble.
- peanutcracker 6y agoFor what? Surely it is legal to have an opinion about stocks?
- newacct583 6y agoFor securities fraud. If he was (as it seems there is some evidence to show) selling at the same time he was boosting a stock, he wasn't expressing a sincerely held opinion. He was executing a pump and dump. I mean, yes, it's possible the guy simply timed this perfectly, promoted a stock based on an understanding that was technically incorrect but genuinely held, and did nothing wrong. But nine times in ten, that's not how it works. The incentives to cheat in this space are, obviously, huge. And that's why we have an SEC with law enforcement powers. I remain amazed at the amount of credence WSB is giving this fundamentally anonymous yahoo on the internet. You'll at least grant that there are people who want to scam you in the same way that this guy did, right?