2 ms·
This is exactly my question as well. There's no way it's cheaper than planting trees and is probably orders of magnitude less efficient. And the plants itself m
by ping_pong 6y ago
This is exactly my question as well. There's no way it's cheaper than planting trees and is probably orders of magnitude less efficient. And the plants itself must be producing an enormous amount of waste of pollution itself.
- criddell 6y ago> There's no way it's cheaper than planting trees and is probably orders of magnitude less efficient. Do your cost and efficiency calculation include the opportunity cost of letting land sit "idle"?