3 ms·
The article says the developer was never named, as if that had anything to do with the actual problems. Everything about this project sounds insane & inept. S
by dade_ 6y ago
The article says the developer was never named, as if that had anything to do with the actual problems. Everything about this project sounds insane & inept.
Some questions in my mind while reading this article (but I couldn't find them quickly in a search):
Who were the executives that were running the company? Sounds like something that should be taught to MBA as well as CS students. Further, the AECL was a crown corporation of the Canadian government. Who was the minister and bureaucrats in charge of the department? What role did they have in solving or covering up the issue?
- strken 6y agoThe article has a very long explanation of why one developer is not to blame, and why it's entirely the fault of the company for having no testing procedure and no review process.