4 ms·
I agree with both of these as good personal policy in mixed indoor settings. I reject "virus denier" as bait. Look at Newsom and the many other hypocrites caug
by BrendanEich 6y ago
I agree with both of these as good personal policy in mixed indoor settings.
I reject "virus denier" as bait. Look at Newsom and the many other hypocrites caught in flagrante maskless. They were not denying the virus exists in their public words, but their nominally private deeds said something about their sense of relative risks that doesn't fit your cult-like "denier" language.
- dboreham 6y agoOk, I admit there are "virus-lazy" people as well as virus deniers. I'm in Montana and here I believe it's a reasonable assumption that someone without a mark in a mask-required scenario is a denier, based on my f2f (outside!) discussions with people. Many deniers. Full blown FoxNews regurgitation.
- BrendanEich 6y agoNewsom may be lazy or not, but his mask-free dinner out didn’t show sloth, it showed corruption and lack of concern (probably in part based on him being young and fit enough to have low risk per the CDC age-grouped IFR table). What are your neighbors denying, exactly?
- dboreham 6y agoThat the virus exists or is a practical problem. I'm in deep QAnon territory here.