4 ms·
> But I also support forcing people to grapple with the cost of government once a year. But that's one-sided: people do not have the same requirement to "grap
by Majromax 6y ago
> But I also support forcing people to grapple with the cost of government once a year.
But that's one-sided: people do not have the same requirement to "grapple" with the benefits of government once a year. That feeds right into known cognitive biases, where we underweight small but steady effects and overweight concentrated effects.
If you had a "yearly day of reckoning" with your partner where you re-hashed every argument, fight, or disagreement from the previous year without commensurate attention to the benefits, I daresay it would not be good for your relationship.
Moreover, this approach doesn't even seem to be effective at instruction. In particular, many people don't seem to understand the difference between marginal and average tax rates (link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724773/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724773/), which is a precondition for understanding the system as a whole.
- rayiner 6y ago> But that's one-sided: people do not have the same requirement to "grapple" with the benefits of government once a year. Presumably you experience that every day. Moreover, politicians spend tons of time talking about those benefits.
- eyelidlessness 6y ago> Presumably you experience that every day That’s the kind of thing that becomes invisible when contrasted with a major personal economic event.