4 ms·

It's pretty straight forward to have both Whatsapp and [alternative messaging app] installed on your phone. You still have an SMS app on your phone, which was t

It's pretty straight forward to have both Whatsapp and [alternative messaging app] installed on your phone. You still have an SMS app on your phone, which was the primary messaging application prior to Whatsapp. A lot of people migrated to Whatsapp because it was more secure and private than SMS. Now that advantage is being questioned, I think it's logical to see a migration to something more secure or private.

j3th9n 6y ago
Most people migrated to WhatsApp because it was free, not because it was more secure and private, for a long time it wasn't: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reception_and_criticism_of_WhatsApp_security_and_privacy_features https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reception_and_criticism_of_Wha...
- rimeice 6y ago
  "A lot of people" is a bit different to "most people". SMS is free in the same sense that Whatsapp is free and you need a phone contract to use either when you're not in a wifi network. In fact there was a period where adding 3G to your phone contract was noticeably more expensive. Regardless, my point is that there is a logical path that some people will take to move to more private options. I'm doing exactly what I described in my comment, a bunch of my friends are doing it and I don't think we're that exceptional.
- j45 6y ago
  I remember people installing WhatsApp because it was the easiest inter device chat other than sms. It was BBM for the masses.
_susanoo 6y ago
I don't think many people migrated to Whatsapp because it's more secure and private than SMS. I think people migrated because it was free and it had better functionality than SMS. If they did migrate because of privacy and sercurity, how come they don't migrate to apps with better privacy right now?
- rimeice 6y ago
  > how come they don't migrate to apps with better privacy right now? They are. https://twitter.com/signalapp/status/1349577579091566592 https://twitter.com/signalapp/status/1349577579091566592
- hulitu 6y ago
  People migrated to whatsapp because you could talk for free over your internet connection at home. At least in poorer countries.
selfhoster11 6y ago
With that approach, people will end up with 5 messaging apps installed because the friend circles don't perfectly overlap with their app selection.
- ubercow13 6y ago
  Isn't this already normal?
- wobbly_bush 6y ago
  How is the inherently bad? With most people having phones as powerful as computers, there aren't any technical limitations to this.
  - dennis_moore 6y ago
    My phone may be able to handle running a thousand messaging apps at once, but my brain can handle at most one or two before it melts from the sheer ridiculousness of having to deal with the different user interfaces, privacy policies, compatibility issues, etc. of a zillion companies just for something so bizarrely simple as sending a message to a friend.
- rimeice 6y ago
  Yeh I think having 5 messaging apps on your phone is fairly normal already.
- nowherebeen 6y ago
  Everyone used to have only 1 email address. Nowadays, most people have multiple email addresses for different use cases (work, spam, personal). I think this will be the norm for messaging apps as well.
- robjan 6y ago
  If you have only five you are already lucky.

j3th9n 6y ago

Most people migrated to WhatsApp because it was free, not because it was more secure and private, for a long time it wasn't: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reception_and_criticism_of_WhatsApp_security_and_privacy_features https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reception_and_criticism_of_Wha...

rimeice 6y ago
"A lot of people" is a bit different to "most people". SMS is free in the same sense that Whatsapp is free and you need a phone contract to use either when you're not in a wifi network. In fact there was a period where adding 3G to your phone contract was noticeably more expensive. Regardless, my point is that there is a logical path that some people will take to move to more private options. I'm doing exactly what I described in my comment, a bunch of my friends are doing it and I don't think we're that exceptional.
j45 6y ago
I remember people installing WhatsApp because it was the easiest inter device chat other than sms. It was BBM for the masses.

_susanoo 6y ago

I don't think many people migrated to Whatsapp because it's more secure and private than SMS. I think people migrated because it was free and it had better functionality than SMS. If they did migrate because of privacy and sercurity, how come they don't migrate to apps with better privacy right now?

rimeice 6y ago
> how come they don't migrate to apps with better privacy right now? They are. https://twitter.com/signalapp/status/1349577579091566592 https://twitter.com/signalapp/status/1349577579091566592
hulitu 6y ago
People migrated to whatsapp because you could talk for free over your internet connection at home. At least in poorer countries.

selfhoster11 6y ago

With that approach, people will end up with 5 messaging apps installed because the friend circles don't perfectly overlap with their app selection.

ubercow13 6y ago
Isn't this already normal?
wobbly_bush 6y ago
How is the inherently bad? With most people having phones as powerful as computers, there aren't any technical limitations to this.
- dennis_moore 6y ago
  My phone may be able to handle running a thousand messaging apps at once, but my brain can handle at most one or two before it melts from the sheer ridiculousness of having to deal with the different user interfaces, privacy policies, compatibility issues, etc. of a zillion companies just for something so bizarrely simple as sending a message to a friend.
rimeice 6y ago
Yeh I think having 5 messaging apps on your phone is fairly normal already.
nowherebeen 6y ago
Everyone used to have only 1 email address. Nowadays, most people have multiple email addresses for different use cases (work, spam, personal). I think this will be the norm for messaging apps as well.
robjan 6y ago
If you have only five you are already lucky.