Because I found Argdown a bit too simple, and other tools overly complex, I long ago started work on my own argument mapping tool: http://socratrees.wiki http:/

Because I found Argdown a bit too simple, and other tools overly complex, I long ago started work on my own argument mapping tool: http://socratrees.wiki http://socratrees.wiki I wrote up a paper on the results of an initial usability study: Socratrees: Exploring the Design of Argument Technology for Layman Users (https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.04478 https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.04478) Still work in progress, but still in progress! Unlike other argument technology my primary focus is claim reuse, and supporting negated forms of claims. Underlying arguments for a claim and its negation are naturally bundled together. I also have some stricter requirements on 'valid' claims in the system to make this work, and to encourage reuse so that more canonicality can be achieved.