3 ms·
Not when acres directly correlate with the amount of energy being generated. The Sahara has very few people but would be ripe energy-generation space.
by tolien 6y ago
Not when acres directly correlate with the amount of energy being generated. The Sahara has very few people but would be ripe energy-generation space.
- DetroitThrow 6y agoI think far-off deserts aren't nearly lofty enough in the context of which nations are furthest ahead in renewable energy generation... Why not set the baseline with Mercury? That's an entire planet with much more solar capacity than any measly desert!
- tolien 6y agoI mean, if we're going for complete absurdity why not build a Dyson Sphere? Getting back into the real world (and the original point, although accidentally I think you've made my point that energy generated per-capita isn't relevant) and putting aside that there are actual thoughts to build a solar farm in the north Sahara [1]... Texas has lots of surface area currently used by agriculture so while it's cute to suggest cornfields don't need electrical power there's a conversation about whether there's space which could productively generate power and send it over the grid which the rest of the state (and through HVDC interconnects, the rest of North America) is connected to? 1: https://theconversation.com/solar-panels-in-sahara-could-boost-renewable-energy-but-damage-the-global-climate-heres-why-153992 https://theconversation.com/solar-panels-in-sahara-could-boo...