7 ms·
From earlier today (since it's related, especially the HN comments): http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2612245 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2612245 Pe
by nbpoole 15y ago
From earlier today (since it's related, especially the HN comments): http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2612245 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2612245
Personally, I would be wary of using any contract written by someone who isn't a lawyer. Telling people that you feel "there is no need to state the obvious as many contracts do" doesn't instil a lot of confidence either: how do you know what needs to be explicitly stated and what doesn't?
- dbeardsl 15y agoI mentioned that because I'd seen a lot of contracts that included drivel about how the developer is free to have other contracts, free to set their own hours, ... stuff that is implicit. Getting a contract like this worked over by a lawyer would be a great help. That's why I open-sourced it, hoping to get more exposure and some feedback from knowledgeable people.
- dmboyd 15y agoIt may be implicit, however some tax laws (I'm Australian, not sure of how this works in the states) can look through contracts and treat them as employment arrangments unless the contracts specifically allow for the ability to subcontract out work, the ability to work for other people and for the responsibility regarding rectification of work. I'd be interested to know if the US has similar look through arrangements for contractors.