5 ms·
I don't know what happened with his antigen tests - but there is scientific backed data on their efficacy - and it is pretty good: https://www.semanticscholar.o
by zby 6y ago
I don't know what happened with his antigen tests - but there is scientific backed data on their efficacy - and it is pretty good: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Comparison-of-seven-commercial-SARS-CoV-2-rapid-Corman-Haage/685da6c3c320128231679e51ab2f8a846cc0dd23 https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Comparison-of-seven-co...
- esotericn 6y ago"Pretty good" isn't good enough for this sort of thing though. If you care about contracting coronavirus, if for you infection is a death sentence, then you need something daft like a 99.9999% certainty that people and things you interact with aren't carrying the virus, and that doesn't just include their nasal passages; it means them not having it on their hands, or on their clothes, or whatever else. In the real world, outside of these hyper corporate events, most people I know who aren't vulnerable just take basic measures because if we get the virus it'll probably be fine. But that's not good enough if you're selling snake oil.
- zby 6y agoFor everything you need a use case. You list those where antigen tests don't fit - but it does not mean they are trash.