4 ms·
And here comes philosophy. Is it that hard to point out flaws where beneficiaries are few and uneven? It should be obvious to anyone from looking at the numbers
by AstralStorm 6y ago
And here comes philosophy. Is it that hard to point out flaws where beneficiaries are few and uneven? It should be obvious to anyone from looking at the numbers, yet literally nothing is done until powder keg explodes. And then things can go even worse.
Most importantly, nobody is actually experimenting. (Not even the Chinese.) Status quo is king, old tried solutions are queen, and propaganda is jack.
- gretch 6y ago>nobody is actually experimenting Experimentation with society requires risk taking and uncertainty. Of course no one wants it. What if someone came up to you and said "hey we're going to put your kid into a new type of experimental school. We think there's a a 50% chance we can save money on education but there's 20% chance they'll be severely undereducated. Btw, you can't opt out because that would mess up the integrity of the randomized selection process" That's some dystopian level shit