4 ms·
That ignores the understanding problem of power struggle for resources between those that have a lot and those that don't. It assumes all actors have intentions
by dmingod666 6y ago
That ignores the understanding problem of power struggle for resources between those that have a lot and those that don't. It assumes all actors have intentions for the "common good". The system is the way it is because it works for someone, it just seems broken to you because you are not the beneficiary..
- AstralStorm 6y agoAnd here comes philosophy. Is it that hard to point out flaws where beneficiaries are few and uneven? It should be obvious to anyone from looking at the numbers, yet literally nothing is done until powder keg explodes. And then things can go even worse. Most importantly, nobody is actually experimenting. (Not even the Chinese.) Status quo is king, old tried solutions are queen, and propaganda is jack.
- gretch 6y ago>nobody is actually experimenting Experimentation with society requires risk taking and uncertainty. Of course no one wants it. What if someone came up to you and said "hey we're going to put your kid into a new type of experimental school. We think there's a a 50% chance we can save money on education but there's 20% chance they'll be severely undereducated. Btw, you can't opt out because that would mess up the integrity of the randomized selection process" That's some dystopian level shit