3 ms·
> The life expectancy is 14 years vs 48 ...which is still a factor of ~3x, which means my napkin math wasn't too shabby, which means this tangent was completel
by henrikschroder 6y ago
> The life expectancy is 14 years vs 48
...which is still a factor of ~3x, which means my napkin math wasn't too shabby, which means this tangent was completely irrelevant, because my main point is unchanged.
- fastball 6y agoBut you're giving equal weight to a year lived in the prime of someone's life vs. a year lived in a care home, which might not be a reasonable way to calculate it.
- s1artibartfast 6y agofair enough. "closer" but still significantly different is a support for your position.