I appreciate that you are trying to be helpful with this comment, but you're essentially parroting the same line that happy families have been doing for a year

I appreciate that you are trying to be helpful with this comment, but you're essentially parroting the same line that happy families have been doing for a year now. "For example, we have two families that we're co-sheltering with" Right, so you're not alone, and these rules don't result in you having 0 social interaction most days. If I hadn't had the in-person, real contact that I do with friends and family, breaking so-called "rules" to do so, I would have gone postal. Full psychotic break. I was very close, and I am still very close. > you've expressed a preference for putting others at risk I don't have a preference for putting others at risk at all; I don't think you realise how offensive a statement that is. Coronavirus is not the only thing that exists in the universe; for you it may be the #1 most important factor because your other needs are taken care of, that's fine, it's not for everyone. These policies put me at risk. Telling me to look at screens as a substitute for human interaction puts me at risk. Not just me, but my friends and family, a year in everyone is going mental. I am preventing myself from losing control of my mind, which would put myself and others at far more risk than even SARS 1 would have.