5 ms·
I don't know what the first part of your comment is talking about, but I do know from my tiny tiny interactions with him he scores in top 1% of people for hones
by breck 6y ago
I don't know what the first part of your comment is talking
about, but I do know from my tiny tiny interactions with him he
scores in top 1% of people for honesty, intelligence, work
ethic, integrity. He does still seem to have a chip on his shoulder, which I find amusing. Anyway no one is perfect, but some people are true gems.
I for one feel very happy to learn that his mind is focused
on the climate problem.
I don't understand it too well, but my only question is: say
we do figure out how to control earth's temperature, what do
we agree to settle on? I'm hoping for a nice 78 degrees. My
wife wants 80. Not sure how we're gonna resolve that.
- mym1990 6y agoSomething about you being able to place someone into a top percentile of ‘honesty, intelligence, work ethic, integrity’ based on a tiny tiny amount of interactions is suspect...you must be a hell a good judge of character.
- breck 6y agoAs a matter of fact I am quite talented when it comes to spotting outliers. :)
- smt88 6y agoThe reference is to a piece in NYT that led Sacca to admit to sexist behavior[1]. The allegations are mild compared to some others, but I still think you should re-examine your belief that you can assess someone's integrity when you don't know them personally at all. 1. https://www.cnbc.com/2017/07/03/chris-sacca-and-dave-mcclure-confess-to-sexist-behavior.html https://www.cnbc.com/2017/07/03/chris-sacca-and-dave-mcclure...
- breck 6y agoFair enough, but my judgement call still stands. His apology post only confirms that. I don't just someone by their origin but by their vector.