5 ms·
Maybe. If a single claim could wipe out the pension, there's a good chance the department would close ranks even harder than today. You could hope they would po
by ip26 6y ago
Maybe. If a single claim could wipe out the pension, there's a good chance the department would close ranks even harder than today. You could hope they would police themselves better, but once something does happen, Johnny Idiot's mistake has put the entire department's pension at risk. This sets up bad incentives.
- pstuart 6y ago> You could hope they would police themselves better A fool's errand, we know that won't happen on the basis of "doing the right thing". It would have to be structured so that covering up only makes it worse, it is a perfect subject for applying game theory to steer the outcomes.
- giantg2 6y agoYep, currently dealing with a situation like this. The captain of the troop closed my complaint against one of the troopers without any investigation or justification. They didn't even notify me.
- Spivak 6y agoYeah this seems really really bad and I’m surprised that people in tech are suggesting it since we all experience the “if you fuck up you won’t be punished so long as you own to it” policy that makes it so that issues are actually felt with. I mean the poor guy who caused the AWS S3 outage doesn’t need to be personally personally responsible for the millions people lost due to it nor does their teammates via their 401ks. These are structural issues and trying to find someone to scapegoat makes it so people ignore them.
- Jochim 6y agoIf the developer intentionally caused that outage they'd be fired and in court before you could finish saying qualified immunity. Accidents and mistakes happen, but a great deal of these incidents are not individual mistakes, they're often an escalating pattern of behaviour which has been ignored or excused until something terrible happens.