4 ms·
At the time I'm posting this, there are two comments related to the low carbon tech the article is about, the rest are about Chris Sacca and what he did. I for
by shock 6y ago
At the time I'm posting this, there are two comments related to the low carbon tech the article is about, the rest are about Chris Sacca and what he did. I for one, don't find much value in the latter, past the initial awareness of his past. Would it be possible to separate the two threads of conversation so one can participate in the thread that is most valuable for them and not waste time with the other?
- h00dui 6y agoI tend to disagree with this sentiment only because our actions in life have consequences. The SV bro club have/had their issues for obvious reasons & I think its more than fair that entrepreneurs that might be interested in funding from so etc should be aware of such a past. Harvey Weinsteins's new fund is here to help save the world... Should we not mention his past?
- shock 6y agoI did not ask for his past not to be mentioned, I asked if it could be discussed in a different thread, as an optimization. It is much easier to join a discussion in anither thread than to filter out comments in an intermingled thread.
- h00dui 6y agoWould you send your daughter to Saccas house and not mention his past* because he is an investor?
- thryway21421 6y ago> his past* Allegedly "touching someones face" at a private party social event in Las Vegas 12 years ago? I think that doesn't needs a warning. I also think it shouldn't be equated with a convicted serial rapist (Weinstein).